Two masked, unidentified individuals broke into the Church of St. Great Martyr Nedelja in Gornja Gušterica, near Priština, damaging the entrance door and stealing a small sum of money, described as several tens or around 70 euros from donation boxes. The incident occurred during the night and followed closely after a similar burglary at another Serbian Orthodox church in Dobrotin, with all sides agreeing that security cameras or surveillance equipment were tampered with or disabled during the robbery. Reports concur that there were no injuries, that the primary damage was to church property and donations, and that the police and relevant institutions were informed of the break-in.

Both opposition and pro-government-leaning narratives typically frame the event within the broader context of attacks and pressures on Serbian Orthodox sites and the Serbian community in Kosovo and Metohija, noting a recent cluster of similar incidents. They agree that the Office for Kosovo and Metohija and church representatives treat the case as part of a worrying security situation for Serbs, citing additional events such as vandalism at a kindergarten and desecration of a grave in the area. Across the spectrum, coverage situates the robbery within longstanding ethnic and political tensions in Kosovo, referencing the role of international missions and local institutions in ensuring protection of religious and cultural heritage.

Areas of disagreement

Framing of the incident. Opposition-aligned sources tend to present the robbery as a serious but low-level criminal act that highlights the everyday insecurity of Serbs, while being cautious about labeling it a coordinated campaign without firm evidence. Pro-government outlets, by contrast, emphasize the symbolic weight of another attack on the Serbian Orthodox Church and repeatedly describe it as part of a broader pattern of intimidation. Whereas opposition coverage is more likely to stress uncertainty about motives, pro-government coverage strongly links the event to ethnic and political hostility toward Serbs.

Attribution and responsibility. Opposition sources generally avoid directly accusing specific Kosovo institutions or Albanian political actors, focusing instead on failures of law enforcement and the overall climate of impunity. Pro-government media more explicitly suggest that the Kosovo authorities bear political responsibility for creating an environment where such attacks are possible and inadequately punished. While opposition coverage may speak of "unknown perpetrators" and systemic weakness, pro-government coverage tends to imply a toleration or tacit encouragement of anti-Serb incidents by Pristina.

Use of statistics and escalation narrative. Opposition-aligned outlets, where they reference previous incidents, often do so in a more restrained way, citing examples but avoiding definitive claims of orchestrated escalation. Pro-government coverage highlights that this is the fourth incident in a short span, grouping the church burglary with vandalism at a kindergarten and a desecrated grave to argue that there is a clear wave of targeted attacks. Thus, opposition narratives describe a troubling trend without fully endorsing the language of an organized campaign, whereas pro-government narratives systematize the incidents into a single, escalating security threat.

Role of international actors. Opposition reporting tends to call for more effective involvement of international missions and criticize both Belgrade and Pristina for not securing better protections, sometimes implying that Belgrade uses such incidents rhetorically. Pro-government outlets stress that the Office for Kosovo and Metohija will inform the international public and frame this outreach as responsible state action that exposes the vulnerability of Serbs and the failures of international guarantees. Where opposition voices may question whether Belgrade’s internationalization strategy yields concrete safety improvements, pro-government media portray it as a necessary step to pressure Kosovo institutions and international organizations.

In summary, opposition coverage tends to treat the robbery as a symptom of chronic insecurity and institutional weakness with more caution in assigning political intent, while pro-government coverage tends to portray it as a deliberate element of an escalating campaign against Serbs in Kosovo, strongly stressing political responsibility and the need for international attention.