Chronology of Obstruction of the Canopy Procedure
As a prosecutor in the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Novi Sad, he led a preliminary investigation into suspicions of corruption during the reconstruction of the Novi Sad railway station, which included subcontractors Starting and Deko tim, and later the Chinese company CCECC. Because his mandate in the Organized Crime Prosecutor's Office (TOK) was terminated, he filed a lawsuit.
TL;DR
- Prosecutor Aleksandar Barac filed a lawsuit against the High Prosecutorial Council (VST) challenging the termination of his mandate at the Organized Crime Prosecutor's Office (TOK).
- Barac initiated a preliminary investigation into potential corruption during the reconstruction of the Novi Sad railway station, which led to a broader inquiry involving multiple subcontractors and financiers.
- The article outlines alleged political interference and obstruction tactics, including pressure from the executive branch, legislative changes designed to weaken TOK, and a fire that damaged TOK offices.
- Several other prosecutors also had their mandates at TOK terminated, including those involved in the 'Canopy' case and investigations into the Belgrade-Novi Sad high-speed railway project.
- Barac argues that his termination was unlawful and politically motivated, citing violations of due process and international legal standards, and that it hinders crucial ongoing investigations.