How to Prevent the Interregnum from Becoming a Power Vacuum
The results of the parliamentary elections in Serbia have led to changes, and the period of interregnum has brought to the forefront the question of how to stop new blockades, violence, attacks on dissidents, media intrusions, destruction of private property, as well as the actions of certain informal groups that are already affecting certain institutions. Is the key in the winning side highlighting leaders who will take responsibility and address their supporters, but also talk to opponents about the transition of power, so that every citizen feels safe? How to prevent the state, during the interregnum, from sinking into complete anarchy with summary courts and the law of the street, and how much responsibility lies with the winning list, as well as with the current government in technical mandate, at a time when there is no dialogue between the election participants about the peaceful transfer of power, are answered by "Politika's" interlocutors.
TL;DR
- The period between election results and government formation in Serbia presents a risk of blockades, violence, and attacks on dissidents.
- Experts discuss the importance of leaders taking responsibility, engaging in dialogue with opponents, and ensuring citizen safety during the transition.
- Concerns exist about the state descending into anarchy, with summary courts and 'street law' prevailing if not managed responsibly.
- Professor Čedomir Antić notes the election results were acknowledged, but warns of a deep 'totalitarian, culturistic, and anarchoid' culture among some citizens.
- Former Deputy Speaker Gordana Čomić stresses that all election actors and the technical government have an obligation to act responsibly and uphold the rule of law.
- Commissioner Milan Antonijević highlights the need for prompt institutional reactions to illegal actions and emphasizes that opposing political opinions are allowed.
- There is a consensus that changes in public institutions and media must follow legal procedures, not pressure or external influence.
- The lack of a unified 'party' among election winners is seen as a future challenge for effectively communicating with supporters and opponents.
- The Student List stated that election violations will be addressed institutionally after the new government is formed, emphasizing renewal and accountability.