Butchers' narratives and false patriotism always end in theft
Rethinking cultural policy has been a long-standing problem for state institutions, but until Minister Selaković's appointment, bad personnel decisions, capacity for corruption, and a return to past values and aesthetics were not viewed positively. This year's Venice Biennale is a prime example.
TL;DR
- The selection process for Serbia's Venice Biennale representation was allegedly hidden and lacked transparency.
- The chosen artist, Predrag Đaković, and his curatorial team have faced criticism for their qualifications and lack of connection to contemporary art.
- The current cultural policy is described as a return to outdated, nationalistic narratives from the late 80s and early 90s.
- Accusations of corruption and "investor urbanism" are linked to the Ministry of Culture and the handling of cultural heritage sites.
- There is a perceived lack of experience and institutional memory in Serbia's participation in international art events like the Venice Biennale.
- Professional organizations have limited influence on state institutions regarding cultural policy.