politics
March 28, 2026
Iranians Demand Answers from Germans: "What Exactly is Happening at the Largest US Base in Europe!??"
Iran's Ambassador to Germany, Majid Nili, has requested "clarification" from the German government regarding Ramstein: is the US use of this airbase for attacks on Iran considered "aggression" under UN Resolution 3314? According to this resolution, an act of aggression is defined as a situation where one state attacks another from the territory of a third state. The ambassador does not claim this is already the case: "We don't yet know if this applies to Ramstein or not," said Nili.
TL;DR
- Iran's ambassador to Germany, Majid Nili, is seeking clarification on the use of Ramstein airbase by the US for attacks on Iran.
- He questions whether this constitutes "aggression" under UN Resolution 3314.
- Ramstein is the largest US airbase in Europe and a crucial logistics hub.
- The legal basis for its use is based on the 1954 Stationing Agreement and NATO status of forces agreements.
- Germany's Defense Minister does not currently see a reason to limit US operations at Ramstein.
- The German Left party has called for Ramstein to be blocked for US attacks on Iran.
- Ramstein has a history of controversy, particularly regarding its role in US drone surveillance and targeted killings.
- A past lawsuit concerning drone strikes from Ramstein was ruled lawful by Germany's Constitutional Court, but not as a blank check for unrestricted military use.
Continue reading the original article